This is a summary of the recent activities of the OSMF Working Groups. While it strives to be an accurate report, the official minutes are to be considered accurate when this summary differs from them. The intent is for these periodic summaries to include information from more working groups and board meetings. This is the first summary so it probably deserves some background.
When the new OSMF board was formed for 2010, a task was set to new board members Emilie Laffray and Oliver Kühn to “make OSMF better at communicating”. They formed the OSMF Communication Working Group and invited Harry Wood and Richard Weait to participate in the initial plans for the group.
Initial discussions looked at all of the current forms of communication in which the OSMF participates. This was a long and diverse list and was frankly overwhelming. So it was decided to tighten the scope of the CWG, at least initially, to “Make OSMF better
at communicating with the OSMF members and wider OSM community.”
That goals was formalized and presented to the OSMF Board during a recent board meeting as:
CWG currently has four members and will expand according to opportunity and need. CWG will focus initially on outgoing communication from OSMF Board and Working Groups to OSMF members, OSM community and the public. CWG will continue to monitor and consider other communication channels for opportunities to improve communication. CWG see the openstreetmap.org web site as within scope of CWG, but not a top priority.
CWG will continue with weekly or bi-weekly meetings according to availability and current tasks. CWG will make use of the currently dormant blog.osmfoundation.org (this blog), as an official OSMF Board and Working Group announcement source. This will cross-link generously with OpenGeoData.org which is a source of OSM-related news and commentary. CWG will encourage regular use of blog.osmfoundation.org for periodic summaries of Working Group activities and OSMF Board business.
That brings us up to date to the recent CWG meeting on 06 October 2010.
Summary of Communication Working Group meeting of 06 October 2010
The CWG recognized that Hurricane Coast had volunteered to join the CWG and her offer was unanimously accepted. Hurricane is expected to join the CWG as of 11 October 2010.
Harry is leading the review of current OSMF / OSM communication channels. This review will continue for the foreseeable future.
Apart from content, and making better use of blog.osmfoundation.org, the CWG would like to tidy up the OSMF web sites a bit. CWG seeks technical guidance on this topic and those with both MediaWiki skinning and WordPress theming experience are welcome to share their thoughts with CWG on this matter.
CWG have asked the OSMF Board for permission to pick up the OSMF logo competition which seems to have fallen dormant.
CWG to summarize CWG activities in a “human-readable” format and post them to blog.openstreetmap.org
Summary of OSMF Board Meeting of 07(?) October 2010
A first face-to-face meeting of the new board is planned for the week-end of the 12th December.
A request for a financial support for a OSM related project came up: It was decided to let the Strategic Working Group establish a policy for under which circumstances financial support can be granted. In addition it was discussed to set up a “pin board” that serves as exchange for specific sponsoring opportunities: projects that require funding and people/companies that want to sponsor can find each other.
A task was established to evaluate how operational spendings can be approved without waiting for a board meeting.
It was decided that no exceptions will made for the new contributor terms – regardless of the contributions of any (potential) user.
Summary of Communication Working Group meeting of 11 October 2010
The first order of business for the Communication Working Group meeting of 11 October 2010 was to welcome new participant Hurricane Coast. The first CWG blog post, a summary of recent Board and Working Group minutes is expected on or about Thursday 14 October 2010. A twitter account for CWG or the Foundation Board was considered but it was decided to use the existing @openstreetmap account until a clear requirement for a CWG account arises.
Analytics has been added to osmfoundation.org to assist in measuring interest in the various pages of the osmfoundation site. CWG would like to get an idea of the interest in various pages on OpenGeoData.org as well. What interests the community. What would the community like for us to communicate about?
Summary of License Working Group Meeting 12 October 2010
This meeting was largely a summary of outstanding issues around existing imports, derivation and ODbL/CT. According to the import catalogue only 13 cases rely upon only CC-By-SA, they effect (Poland 1, Germany 5, Czech Republic 1, Wikipedia 1, France 1, Sweden 1, The Netherlands 2, UK 1, Australia 1). Only 10 rely upon only CC-By, they effect (Australia 9 (possibly + 2 more?), New Zealand 1)
With so few cases in play, direct discussion to negotiate required permissions is possible.
The new UK Open Government license will have to be watched as it may be compatible with future OSM.
A review of the Contributor Terms is in progress. Some terms are being reviewed by counsel, others have been reviewed and will be unchanged.
LWG considered adding a Hall of Shame, to list alleged OSM license violations as they are brought to the attention of the LWG.
Summary of Communication Working Group meeting of 18 October 2010
Nothing substantial to report. Next meeting 01 November 2010.
First of all I think it’s great that you started this working group and are bringing more attention to communication.
One thing I was wondering about while I was reading the text are the URL choices you’ve made. To me and probably to a lot of not so much involved OSM contributors and people interested in OSM they don’t make so much sense.
Why is the OSMF not exclusively blogging at blog.osmfoundation.org and leaving blog.osm.org for a wider OSM (news) blog or at least redirecting it to OpenGeoData for the time being? I think that would make much more sense.
Harry has pointed out the redirect already. It is probably worth noting that the community news blog feed, which aggregates many OSM related blogs, is unchanged at
Do we have to use google analytics?
@jokru Yeah the actual URL we’re talking about is http://blog.osmfoundation.org (I’ve edited the blog post to refer to this instead) There is a redirect from http://blog.osmfoundation.org to http://blog.osmfoundation.org, but the latter is the correct URL to reference. We’re not actually changing any URLs at the moment, just awakening this blog and making more use of it.